microblogposting and pimping together at last

::begin self pimping session::

Today I’m working my ass off. Pumping out four new proposals before midnight and catching up on a ridiculous amount of work. Harnessing a new level of productivity.  And so in my journal of “to do lists” i assigned myself a quick blog post.

To Do: list current projects in a blog post.
To Do: pimp self out on blog for speaking engagements
To Do: write a real microblog – something longer than 140 characters but shorter than a Mashable post

So here it is.
My narcissistic microblogpost: what i’m working on, some clients, speaking engagements etc…in no particular order b/c they are all badass.

conferences/ lectures

  • Stanford University February, 2009
  • Noise Pop Industry Noise February 2009
  • SxSW interactive March 2009

If you have any questions about any of these projects, or speaking engagements please contact me at coreydenis[at]gmail[dot]com.
::end self pimping session::

Posted in: General, Resources, The Intertubes, endorsements | Leave a comment »

Interactive vs Non Interactive: in a cute little nutshell, and SXSW 2009

Right now, somewhere in the bay area, is a music-tech company you know and love having a bad morning. Right this minute. And the true core of the issue lies at the chasm between technology and policy.  I only have a few minutes to blog today, so I’ll explain this quickly:

If a music service requires your participation, it is considered  to be “Interactive.” The cost of using copyrighted material to develop  an interactive product is different (higher) than developing a non-interactive product.
BUT…There’s no stipulation in any IP law or digital millenium copyright act for the reality of technology such that a user may actually interact with a product versus directly with the music (aka on demand.)  There’s no clause for a case where the music is not interactive (internet radio) but interaction with the product enhances the listening experience.  There’s no clause for the human and product transaction. Only the human-music interaction is covered. Which means the product is, according to the law, operating illegally if paying fees as “non interactive” when it has (even if unfairly) been determined to be interactive.

Unfortunately for everyone involved, there’s no verbage, no legalese, no written word to address any music product with this type of user experience.  Interaction with a product is not on-demand music.  The experience is enhanced by interacting with the product. How can policy measure the value of experience?

IDEA: Interactive though it may be, interaction with a product to enhance the experience of art is a different level of interactivity.

Perhaps the conflicts and legal battles within the music industry (roaring as i type) will seek to adjust according to progress and user experience.

Til then, there’s Rusty Hodge at SxSW 2009: Rewriting the DMCA
see you there.

Posted in: Digital Music News, Music & Music Services, Resources, The Intertubes | Leave a comment »

10 Reasons

10 reasons why i blog, in no particular order

1.  creative outlet; expression
2. share music, literature, movies, tv, entertainment that i enjoy
3. in retrospect it feels like a published photo album, logging a snapshot of writing over time
4. it’s scary
5. sense of community with other bloggers
6. my friend christopher may made me do it
7. i learn from my blog (ex: using certain languages for design)
8. exercises writing skills or lack thereof
9. data. i love data.
10. pure and total enjoyment

Posted in: Just For Fun, The Intertubes | Leave a comment »

Social Experiment Volume 3: i already don’t give a shit and it’s been less than 10 days

Summary:
goodreads is the bomb. twitter is occasional. facebook works well for events, reuniting with friends of yore and accrues my activity in certain applications. flickr is a nice home for my photos and a powerful photo sharing network. lala is worth every penny. myrockstar.com is fun. I’m free, but i’m focused.  In less than ten days of walking away and refusing to get caught up in the notion of a “brand,” it makes sense. I still see the personal brand managers who clearly build a brand for themselves for no apparent reason. tag tag tag without thought. vanity startups. hurting each other, spreading gossip – it’s all moot.  Just ten short days ago, however, i did care. I suppose the shift comes from turning my back to bad behavior  (including my own) and opting to embrace productivity, letting go of trying to change the world. letting go of feeling guilty just for existing.

i’ve made a complete decision.
I’d rather be whole than good.

The locked twitter account makes it less meaningful to me. I don’t need it for SEO, I don’t want it for SEO, and if I don’t want you to see me, you can’t. Though admittedly, I’ve “accepted” all applicants. The nature of my tweets hasn’t changed.  While it’s only been ten days, there has been no direct effect on my personal career….other than one thing: the ability to share links outside of the twitter network and the fun/ functionality of participating in memes.  Which, frankly, is an asset to anyone who wants to help drum up attention for another piece of information online.

one major observation: if sharing is caring then social network privacy is a conundrum. limitation of information sharing can reduce the information to nonexistent – where it could otherwise exist as an available form of data in the great big library in the sky. Removing the elements of open web community requires strategic acknowledgement that shared information only becomes available to a 1 or 2 way subscription model.  The goal of information sharing dictates the value of an open channel.

I’m glad i don’t need this to survive professionally (so far), though most of my opportunities require me to prove my social network prowess (so the results remain to be seen).  Ten days in, i don’t really notice the absence of social networks as part of my daily routine, though i’ve been signed in as other artists and labels, creating profiles all week long. I have noticed there are specific benefits to my career for being good at using them. If i had not used facebook for events these last 10 days, and did not use the button in my toolbar to share links on facebook,  i would not have noticed the new “like” commentary feature in the platform.  Emotion: Satisfaction

Today report:
Twitter was fun (emotion: happy)  today thanks to 1234567890 day and the subsequent discovery that so many of my friends have passion for the unix operating system.  In the last 3 days 4 different friends have noted “i miss your tweets” and 2 different friends instant messaged me to ask why my feed was private.

“What’s the matter? got a stalker?”
“yes, more than one over the last few years….but that’s not why i did it. I just wanted to see how i’d feel.”

we’re still humans right?  I’m feeling pretty good today (emotion: positively happy).  Have a great weekend, internets.

Posted in: The Intertubes | Leave a comment »

personal social network experiment: volume 2

Withdrawal Report/ Some Observations:

- tweeted 4 times during grammys, felt joyful and fun.
- found new bio photo for panels & speaking opps & was tempted to put it up as my twitter photo, facebook, all branding outlets…but didn’t.
- feeling happiness over new relationship with blog. blogged more than usual.
- logged into facebook for events after an email prompt, found that i’d been tagged in a photo from BAGeL Radio’s awesome bday party. felt happiness, the photo won’t offend anyone, i left the tag up and revelled in the memory (GREAT SHOW OMG)

Bizarre Real-Life Situation: Creepiest Power Outage (EVER)

While finishing Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, the power in my house went out. I’m afraid of the dark, and was alone in a 3 story home.  Fear of darkness started about 6 months ago at the ripe young age of 35. So, i did the only logical thing: i lit a comical number of tealights, so that my room was bright enough to…..continue reading The Road.  (oh hai masochist!)  …..and I finished it in the dark. I can’t think of a better way to confront fear of darkness.  And here i am, telling the story from the light.  Yes, today I am that much stronger. I relied on my iPhone and laptop batteries, both which lasted the full 150 minute power outage.  Hello strength, goodbye nightlight?  ::one day at a time::

More Ongoing Observations:

a few great conversations with friends around the theme “it’s all fun until someone gets hurt” – general consensus seems to be that more individuals within the SF social network bubble are suffering lately. It is a combination of overstimulation, economic fear (and envy), and relationships which are hardly perfect and more often flawed in ways that can’t be sorted out in a digital platform.


some random thoughts and actions:

really deciding that i want no part of the “hurt” – when it does or does not involve me.  Made vow to not post pictures in facebook which could hurt another person, with or without privacy settings. Noticed my friend changed a relationship status, and felt sad for him/her. quickly logged out and instead made human contact with that same friend.  I will never understand the comments on relationship “news” on facebook even if they are good positive comments for a relationship “announcement.”  It seems like an excessive part of the platform designed for eventual pain. As i said, married/ not married is fairly concrete, but everything else in between is nothing less than an ongoing mystery of complication. Sometimes (and often) wonderful, but all part of a journey which might be better left out of social networks and within the walls of the relationships themselves.  Didn’t we outgrow it in college, or do some kids still want a lavalier? I’ve seen both sides, and decided to keep it simple and therefore personal.  but still, i’m one day at a timing. what do i know. not much….and that’s all i do know.

Posted in: The Intertubes | Leave a comment »

What Would Narcissus Do?

I’m inspired by Jason Calacanis.  I’ve met him twice, and he has no idea who i am.  But i can’t wait to thank him, and here’s the why and the how of it all:

The anti-surplus: The simulation of our social groups online is  a veiled, contrived representation of who we are, and has dangerous potential power over  emotional growth, emotional intelligence, and empathy.

With all the thought i’ve put into the internet over the last few weeks, i’ve done the exact opposite of my own self expectations: i felt the internet.  The anti-internet became evident.  I’ve watched people for whom i once had respect become more socially regressed than their own children (or the children they are old enough to have).  the appearance is fun, but the reality is disturbing. Forward motion and progress is impeded by every regression.

I noticed something else: there are those who use the tools in ways to promote themselves for no other reason than to be adored [another form of social regression.] This is the section of users who unconsciously ask themselves What Would Narcissus Do? And then blatantly follow suit.  The anti-surplus.

Developmentally, it’s factual: adolescents  lack a specific adult-acquired level of empathy because they are mostly wrapped up in their own image, and will justify  social misgivings based solely on how they manicure their appearances. The sun sets on them. The moon rises for them. They deny it, but deny it while brushing their hair.

I’m 35 years old.  And just as it was then, it is now: something about it feels wrong and possibly dangerous.

On February 3, 2009 I broke up with the internet, in my own ridiculous way: I created my own social experiment. and since paying  research subjects to contribute or participate is both impossible (oh hai Great Depression 2.0) and potentially unethical (see DHARMA Initiative), i have only one person whose experience i can share with the internet:  me.

Social experiments are risky, the potential to get flamed is high. But that’s all part of the game.

The simulation of  social groups online and the functionality of each feature builds a veiled, contrived sense of self in which empathy is  an action item.  Click this box to feel nothing. Click this box to make another person cry. Poke this person to make them laugh.

Many times it is fun, but just as Jason pointed out: what about that myspace suicide case? The justin.tv suicide, or the slew of other people (you’ve seen them, or you have friends) who have experienced pain in real life because of a news feed, social action item or broken algorithm?  i have no answers for myself and Alice hasn’t finished her dissertation yet, so it’s me and my blog, a pinch of digital fearlessness and my quick typing fingers.

For as long as i can stand it, NotShocking.com will temporarily monitor my human experience of an attempt to (at least temporarily) abandon “personal brand”  and engage in self care, while still functioning at full potential with regard to my jobs within the music industry.  I have no idea what to expect of myself.  I already hate having a private twitter feed, because i can’t participate in fun twitter groups, a few of which i’ve helped create and are music-oriented. #gah!

I am instead forcing myself to blog this experience with brutal honesty.

For as long as i can really do this…. I will explore why i use the interwebs the way i do, and what it feels like to be with or without it. At the same time it will be key to maintain why i find these tools useful or destructive for the self, the core human being within – and i will also focus on why each specific tool is useful or destructive for the music & entertainment industry.  After all, i love what i do for a living.  How intertwined is my living with my digital self? I hope to figure it out. right here. on this very blog.

I will still use lala, goodreads, imeem, last.fm…..I will monitor closely how any of this affects my ability to fuel my passions with regard to assisting labels and bands with building a functional digital presence.

While my goal is to remain unbiased about myself, i can’t live a paradox -everything about these blog posts is biased. so I’ll honestly share my expectation: to discover a vast usefulness for entertainment and to reveal the social networking potential to create  simultaneous infliction of pain alongside fun and playful behavior. I think i will discover  the general internet,  social platforms, are succesful for those who crave [or need] fame, fun for reconnecting with old friends, fun for organizing groups and uniting on issues of shared interest. However, enjoying social networks for shared interests is potentially nullified by the narcissistic users who are addicted to themselves. addicted to their image, at the expense of empathy and human closeness. These are the people who substitute a human interaction with digital. Connections are algorithms. The magic of the soul and human connection is lost.

How I Broke Up With The Internet & How It’s Going So Far

- Twitter:  privatized feed, took away any risk of my twitter home page functioning as a representation of who i am. changed “name” to my initials to avoid people-search. Nothing about privatizing my feed has, thus far, inspired me to tweet information any more personal than before.

- Facebook: hunkered down on a few privacy settings, removed info from facebook search results, put up a note requesting contact via email “facebook for events only”

- blog:  increasing blog posts. reclaiming an intimate relationship with my blog

- goodreads & LaLa:  I will continue to use these sites, because they are completely functional for me at this time.  The act of paying for streams at LaLa pleases me, as does the integrity of their streams & mp3s for sale.  GoodReads is my new love online as it helps me maintain and create reading lists, and talk about books with friends.  These two sites, at least for now, are tools which fall into my “self care” category.

- flickr: for now i have not changed any settings in flickr.  Photography is a new amateurish hobby for me, and i have had a flickr account for 4 years. I can’t give this up but will revisit the idea of privatizing some photos.

Withdrawal Symptoms February 8, 2008

- sent a tweet, thought about changing my icon (which is now blank/ default) to my dog fletch’s face.  The reason i wanted to change to photo is because i saw my own tweet pop up on tweetdeck amongst other tweets from friends and felt left out, since i don’t have an icon (and they do). resisted temptation to add a photo, gave myself permission to revisit this idea tomorrow and wrote blogpost instead.

and um, that’s it. for today. it’s only been 5.5 days.

Posted in: The Intertubes | Leave a comment »

Calacanis: The End Of Empathy

This blog post

We Live in Public (and the end of empathy)

by Jason Calacanis  is incredible. 

::end transmission::

Posted in: The Intertubes | Leave a comment »